A House Divided
by Jonathan F. Putnam
I was surprised to find myself trudging through A House Divided by Jonathan F. Putnam, an author with an outstanding legal and historical background. This is the fourth book in this series, but I did not feel that my not having read the previous books was a hindrance. There just seemed to be a disjoint between the history and fiction of the tale. None of the characters were fleshed out with emotion for me, and so I did not identify with any of them. I really wanted to like this book, but it was difficult when the characters’ motives were rarely disclosed. Lincoln and his friend Speed are competitors for the affections of Mary Todd, but even Mary’s character holds no depth.
The mystery was interesting and based somewhat on history, although the narrator Speed, a major actor in the story, was actually not a part of the real events of the crime and trial. Perhaps that alteration of the facts added to the difficulty of creating an interesting work of historical fiction. Perhaps the problem lies in timidity in assigning thoughts and feelings to major historical figures. Authors may find that easier to do when the main character is either a minor figure on the historical stage or the creation by the author of a composite character based on what a person in that role at that time of history would be like.
I did appreciate the author’s efforts to include the plight of Irish workers and their families. They were caught in the middle of a web of corruption and greed on the part of politicians and bankers. Another positive of the book is the writer’s style which is appropriate to the period.
I would like to extend my thanks to netgalley.com and to Crooked Lane Books for giving me the opportunity to read this book in exchange for an honest review.
Rating: 3/5
Category: Historical Fiction, Mystery
Notes: #4 in the Lincoln and Speed Mystery Series
Publication: July 9, 2019—Crooked Lane Books
Memorable Lines:
The Globe…As a feeding station for hungry village residents or residence for travelers, it was inferior in every respect to the sparkling new American House. Its only advantage at this point was familiarity, like a pair of shoes that slipped on easily despite worn-away soles.
Springfield…But citizens hoping to find entertainment that did not arrive in a bottle or cask were destined to be disappointed. Except when the circuit court was in session to adjudicate the county’s legal disputes. Then, the entire human condition, comedy and tragedy alike, was on display and free for all to watch.
Every turn in the road, every little rise of the prairie, might reveal a clutch of deadly and determined men, ready to hazard their own lives and reckless to mine.
Great review. I’ve read one of these before too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry you didn’t enjoy it.☕👵
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know from looking at the reviews after I posted mine that I am in the minority. I really expected to like it; I know you did and we usually agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I usually look at reviews to see how I am doing with others. Sometimes we see something that others miss. Yes, the characters were one sided in this book. ☕🐦👵
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is always an audience for a book, it just might not be you or I. Nice, honest review Linda.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. How boring the world would be if we were all to think alike!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s such an interesting point about authors writing the thoughts and feelings of major historical figures. I think that’s why I usually shy away from historical fiction that uses real people—or at least well-known ones. It’s so tricky writing something compelling and accurate with such larger-than-life people. Great review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you and I think you expressed the problem quite well. We are on the same page with that idea.
LikeLiked by 1 person